Go Back to the B3 Home Page
Complaints, compliments, arguments? Email me.
[<< "The Long, Slow Slide continues."] [Main Index] [>>"WMD Update: There aren't any."]
09/06/2003 Archived Entry: "This is not good news."
This is not good news.
Seems our vaunted high-tech military has got a problem with that new vehicle that Carlyle Group made for them.
The Bush administration’s military predicament in Iraq has suddenly gotten worse. Just a month before the next U.S. Army unit is due to deploy in Iraq to relieve the hard-pressed forces already there, the military is confessing to a potential showstopper. The deploying unit’s new armored vehicles may have faulty armor which would leave them vulnerable to machine-gun fire and to the rocket-propelled grenades that are the Iraq insurgents’ favorite weapon.
The vehicle is the prized new Stryker wheeled troop carrier, advertised as the first fruit of the Army’s plan to transform itself into a lighter, go-anywhere-fast force.
Worse still: the Army has known it might have a problem since February, but has kept quiet about it. An Army memo sent yesterday to the head of the Stryker program, and obtained by NEWSWEEK, reports: “Evidently this issue was first raised in February 2003. Am unsure how this issue escaped public scrutiny for six months.” Not even Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was told, NEWSWEEK has learned. “Understand that ARSTAF [Army Staff] have been told to treat this issue as if it were ‘classified’,” says the memo, which is addressed to Lt. Gen. John Riggs, the head of the Stryker program. At a recent Army meeting to discuss the faulty armor, the main topic on the agenda, according to a DOD source, was: “How do we tell Secretary Rumsfeld?” Rumsfeld is now in Iraq.
Unlike the massively thick steel that tanks are made from, the 19-ton Stryker has a light steel and aluminum structure. But this is clad in 130 ceramic tiles, supposedly tough enough stop heavy machine-gun fire and deflect the blast of incoming RPGs. More than 600 Strykers have been built by General Dynamics, which has a $4 billion contract to produce 2,100 in all. But the ceramic armor tiles are produced for GD by a German subcontractor. The problem arose when the German firm apparently changed the mix of ingredients in the tiles. (The firm could not be reached for comment.)
The Army discovered this in February, sources say, when, as standard quality control, some tiles were X-rayed. Further tests revealed that, on some batches of tiles, the subcontractor had changed not only the ingredients but parts of the manufacturing process too. In August, a tile from one of those errant batches failed to stop machine-gun bullets in a live-fire test at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in northern Maryland, according to Army sources.
Replies: 3 people speak up
just another example of bush supporting the troops. when they kept telling us to support the troops, i didnt think they meant financially,
we are spending 500 billion dollars a year on the defense department. where the fuck is all that money going? not to the troops thats for damn sure, and apparently not towards decent military technology either. is rummsfeld embezzeling all of it? what are we getting for 500 billion dollars? does anyone feel safe thanks to the defense department? they ought to call it the offense department, because it doesnt even defend the troops in its own army, let alone the american people. i would feel a lot more defended with a small defensive army. not a giant army that could easily overthrow our government and establish a military dictatorship.
Posted by justin @ 09/06/2003 01:42 PM NY
Willy Loman strikes again...
I have an idea. Next time they test fire on one of these POS why not have the Carlyle Group conduct their Board of Directors meeting inside? This would demonstrate conclusively their faith in the product they are selling us. If they refused to get inside, cancel the contract and save the ammunition.
Posted by TechnoPeasant @ 09/07/2003 06:55 PM NY
i have an even better idea, if they dont get in the vehicle for their board meeting, what if we just shoot them anyway? after all, if they are knowingly selling defective equiptment to the military, i believe that legally qualifies as treason, and last time i checked, treason carries a death sentence in this country.
Posted by justin @ 09/07/2003 08:13 PM NY
