Go Back to the B3 Home Page
Complaints, compliments, arguments? Email me.
[<< "Interesting sentence in the Pentagon's 'new' story..."] [Archive Index] [>>"Imagine, if you will..."]
11/25/2003 Archived Entry: "Putting the 'Dub' in Dubya..."
Putting the 'Dub' in Dubya...
The wonders of modern technology.
When President Bush laid out the potential threat that unconventional weapons posed in Saddam Hussein's hands last year in his State of the Union address last year, he became tongue-tied at an inopportune moment.The line read, "It would take one vial, one canister, one crate, slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known." But Mr. Bush stumbled between the words "one" and "vial." And when at the word vial, he pronounced the "v" as if it were a "w."
Yet in a new Republican commercial that borrows excerpts from that speech, Mr. Bush delivers that line as smoothly as any other in the address, without a pause between "one" and "vial," and the v in "vial" sounds strong and sure.
Republican officials acknowledged yesterday that the change was a product of technology. The line, they said, was digitally enhanced in editing "to ensure the best clarity."
The difference between the speech and excerpt was noticed by strategists for former Gov. Howard Dean of Vermont. They saw it as they put together their own advertisement attacking the spot, which presents the Democratic candidates as undermining the fight against terrorism. Word trickled back to Democratic officials, who retrieved the tape and confirmed that there was, indeed, a difference.
Replies: 7 people speak up
It's amazing what you guys consider news.
Posted by Geoffrey @ 11/25/2003 08:28 PM NY
Well, it's not a blue dress, but I find it amusing.
BTW, I left this part out. From the NYTimes article:
"The Democrats asked whether the Republican National Committee had gone to the White House with sound equipment to have Mr. Bush recite the line anew for what was the first Republican commercial of the campaign season here. That might have meant that the party was not being truthful when it said it had not coordinated with Mr. Bush when it made the advertisement, a possible violation of law."
Posted by editor @ 11/25/2003 09:08 PM NY
That would be an instance of the "letter of the law" over-riding the "spirit of the law".
How come no stories about "make her swim" Kennedy's horribly failed filibuster or the procedure vote Daschle had shoved up his ass?
Posted by Geoffrey @ 11/25/2003 09:23 PM NY
I'm sure you're covering that on your blog. This one's mine.
My blog, my stories. You know how that goes.
Posted by editor @ 11/25/2003 09:32 PM NY
Yep. "Stories" is an incredibly accurate description, too. Just like the ones dad used to read me at night about the big bad monster.
Of course, those were fiction too, but I believed them until I grew up.
Posted by Geoffrey @ 11/25/2003 10:17 PM NY
1984
remember the bureau of disinformation?
Posted by Aristophanes @ 11/25/2003 10:23 PM NY
Close, Geoffrey, but no cigar.
'Stories' as in 'news stories.'
If the content of this blog bothers you so much, there are plenty of other ones to go and visit.
Posted by editor @ 11/26/2003 04:09 AM NY
