Go Back to the B3 Home Page
Complaints, compliments, arguments? Email me.



[<< "Somebody's fired."] [Archive Index] [>>"Capturing Saddam sure cleared things up over there in Iraq."]

12/16/2003 Archived Entry: "'The size of the hole...'"

'The size of the hole...'

Here's the talking point of the day regarding WMD in Iraq - I've seen 3 different Repubs use it today, including Rummy.

Consider the size of the hole they found Saddam in when he was captured. A hole that size could hold enough WMD to kill hundreds of thousands of people!

It's a pretty stupid answer, but it allows them to dodge the fact that there probably aren't any WMD to be found.

Oh, and everyone's using the 'We learned the lessons of 9/11' line, too. They simply cannot stop manipulating, not for a moment.

Replies: 10 people speak up

You can fit a lab, missle launcher/silo, storage equipment, nuclear reactor in a small hole?

Someone please show me an example of any sort of WMD that can me made without tons of material and structures?

Posted by salvage @ 12/16/2003 02:47 PM NY

do you have any idea how much chocolate pudding you could fit in that hole? thats enough choleserol to push at least 10 americans over the edge into heart failure....
hell, meth labs are considered weapons of mass destruction under the patriot act, you could fit a meth lab down there.... or with a microwave you could cook up a lot of crack.
hell, you could fit enough botulin toxin down there to give everyone in nebraskas a face lift. you people are a bunch of terrorist lovers to question how dangerous a small hole in the ground is

Posted by justin @ 12/16/2003 03:03 PM NY

That hole is yet another Weapon of Mass Distraction...

Posted by Alex @ 12/16/2003 05:52 PM NY

Just think of how much Anthrax that hole can hold.

Posted by sellursoul @ 12/16/2003 07:57 PM NY

9/11?
If Bush & Co. had any shred of evidence that Saddam was linked to 9/11, we'd be demanding Saddam be tried in the USofA.

They don't, so he won't.

Posted by Larry Dean @ 12/16/2003 08:00 PM NY

Saddam knows too many of BushCo's skeletons; it's sad, but we won't be hearing much from Saddam... And keeping it in Iraq should pretty well ensure that what little we do hear will be in the Arabic language, too.

Around here, I keep hearing references to cowardice, as evidenced by the hole. Yet didn't Bush go hundred(s) of feet underground in Nebraska on 9/11 when he wasn't sure, as "the world's most powerful man", that someone wasn't out to get him?

(Of course, this was after taking off in AF One, without any fighter escort, upon having learned that AF One might be a target... Real American Genius...)

Posted by web surfer @ 12/16/2003 08:31 PM NY

you people must all be terrorists, holes really can be dangerous, anyone who says otherwise is a traitor. after all, a soldier could step in it and break an ankle or something, and then who would eat all of KBR's rotten meat... sorry different story.

Posted by justin @ 12/17/2003 10:20 AM NY

That and 'there are over 60 countries involved in Iraq'. Which 60?

Posted by Allison @ 12/18/2003 04:43 AM NY

i dont know which 60, but i know that eretrea (wherever that is, and im usually pretty good with geography) i think it is mostly just countries that said "OK, do whatever you want, just leave us out of it" and we are calling them coalition members.

Posted by justin @ 12/18/2003 11:25 AM NY

i dont know which 60, but i know that eretrea is one of them(wherever that is, and im usually pretty good with geography) i think it is mostly just countries that said "OK, do whatever you want, just leave us out of it" and we are calling them coalition members.

Posted by justin @ 12/18/2003 11:25 AM NY

Powered By Greymatter



to top

FINE PRINT: The opinions expressed on this site are those of the author, and are not endorsed by any major political party or organization.